Religion Reviewed
So, since the new Too Much Coffee Man is about to be released, I wanted to run an old article here, one from the last issue. This is the unedited version of a mock review for the Left Behind series (and by unedited, I mean: the mistakes haven't been fixed). The goal isn't so much to review the series. Instead, the goal is to lightly make fun of the way god is marketed, as if he were a flashy new product, which, when you think about it, is a strange thing. Anyway, the gimmick is that I fully incorporate my own reverent views on spirituality into the review process, discarding objectivity like the tattered whore that it is. The segment is entitled:
AN ATHEIST REVIEWS THE LEFT BEHIND SERIES.
The 12th and perhaps final entry in the Left Behind series reached bookshelves earlier this year with the much anticipated release of Glorious Appearing. Curious about the unprecedented success of Christian authors Tim LaHaye and Jerry B. Jenkins, I decided to go ahead and give the first few books in the series a try. But, before judging any book, I think it’s always a good idea to take a quick glance at the country’s current list of best sellers. In doing do, you realize pretty quickly that mainstream fiction is in serious trouble. For instance, I finally caved in to the hype and broke “The Davinci Code”. Let me save you a little money: the secret code is S-H-I-T, okay? For a long time now the popular novel has been going through a bland, repetitive slump, and, as a result, I think it’s unfair to judge books by outdated standards. Like quality, for example.
With a context of mediocrity established, I think its safe to say that the Left Behind series really isn’t all that bad. The books follow the story of Rayford Steele, as he and others try to make sense of the rapture and the significance it holds for their future. Wackiness ensues (wackiness, here, defined as the horrific, nightmarish events as foretold in the prophetic book of Revelation). This is Christianity guising itself as secular, commercial fiction, all in an attempt to convey a message: The impending apocalypse...bad. Religiously getting your shit together...good. While the text is awkward and preachy at times, there’s a light quality to the writing that makes the books very readable. Besides, Revelation is easily the most psychotic book in the bible, so its fun to see the weird-ass predictions unfold in the story.
My main criticism of the Left Behind series is it's questionable method of trying to scare people into accepting a specific belief system. The goal is to market God after all, not national security. Surely there’s a more tactful, appropriate way of spreadingthe word. Jesus himself (clearly a public relations master) never tried to frighten people with worst-case scenarios. He preached love. Acceptance. Free booze at parties. That’s good schtick, and the blatant scare tactics hardly seem necessary.
However, with tens of millions of these books sold, it’s hard to deny that the strategy has been amazingly successful. I’m wondering if this wouldn’t be a workable formula for the other major religions as well. Perhaps Buddhists could scare up membership with the fictional series “Confessions of a Gnat”. Muslims of the extremist persuasion could ponder their after-life with the chilling “Dude, Where’s My Virgin?” (Titles I immediately copyrighted,by the way.)
My only other criticism is that, as a non-believer, I found the lack of cursing in the books sort of off-putting. Again, it gets back to the marketing theme. With a target demographic consisting entirely of non-Christians, a little cursing is a good idea, it sells. Just imagine if, instead of “LeftBehind”, the series had been entitled “DivinelyBitch-Slapped”. Who wouldn’t read that?
In closing, I am giving the four books that I have read so far a grade of C-. I just hope it’s clear that my criticisms are aimed at specific human errors and not at Christianity itself. While I do think that religion has fucked the world over pretty seriously, it’s not like I have anything better to offer. Atheism does have its perks (i.e. getting to skip church on Sunday morning), but there’s also a bit of a downside (i.e. meaningless death. Oh, and the rotting. The inevitable, irreversible rotting). Anyway, stayed tuned for the next issue when a hollow, clinically depressed atheist reviews prozac.
AN ATHEIST REVIEWS THE LEFT BEHIND SERIES.
The 12th and perhaps final entry in the Left Behind series reached bookshelves earlier this year with the much anticipated release of Glorious Appearing. Curious about the unprecedented success of Christian authors Tim LaHaye and Jerry B. Jenkins, I decided to go ahead and give the first few books in the series a try. But, before judging any book, I think it’s always a good idea to take a quick glance at the country’s current list of best sellers. In doing do, you realize pretty quickly that mainstream fiction is in serious trouble. For instance, I finally caved in to the hype and broke “The Davinci Code”. Let me save you a little money: the secret code is S-H-I-T, okay? For a long time now the popular novel has been going through a bland, repetitive slump, and, as a result, I think it’s unfair to judge books by outdated standards. Like quality, for example.
With a context of mediocrity established, I think its safe to say that the Left Behind series really isn’t all that bad. The books follow the story of Rayford Steele, as he and others try to make sense of the rapture and the significance it holds for their future. Wackiness ensues (wackiness, here, defined as the horrific, nightmarish events as foretold in the prophetic book of Revelation). This is Christianity guising itself as secular, commercial fiction, all in an attempt to convey a message: The impending apocalypse...bad. Religiously getting your shit together...good. While the text is awkward and preachy at times, there’s a light quality to the writing that makes the books very readable. Besides, Revelation is easily the most psychotic book in the bible, so its fun to see the weird-ass predictions unfold in the story.
My main criticism of the Left Behind series is it's questionable method of trying to scare people into accepting a specific belief system. The goal is to market God after all, not national security. Surely there’s a more tactful, appropriate way of spreadingthe word. Jesus himself (clearly a public relations master) never tried to frighten people with worst-case scenarios. He preached love. Acceptance. Free booze at parties. That’s good schtick, and the blatant scare tactics hardly seem necessary.
However, with tens of millions of these books sold, it’s hard to deny that the strategy has been amazingly successful. I’m wondering if this wouldn’t be a workable formula for the other major religions as well. Perhaps Buddhists could scare up membership with the fictional series “Confessions of a Gnat”. Muslims of the extremist persuasion could ponder their after-life with the chilling “Dude, Where’s My Virgin?” (Titles I immediately copyrighted,by the way.)
My only other criticism is that, as a non-believer, I found the lack of cursing in the books sort of off-putting. Again, it gets back to the marketing theme. With a target demographic consisting entirely of non-Christians, a little cursing is a good idea, it sells. Just imagine if, instead of “LeftBehind”, the series had been entitled “DivinelyBitch-Slapped”. Who wouldn’t read that?
In closing, I am giving the four books that I have read so far a grade of C-. I just hope it’s clear that my criticisms are aimed at specific human errors and not at Christianity itself. While I do think that religion has fucked the world over pretty seriously, it’s not like I have anything better to offer. Atheism does have its perks (i.e. getting to skip church on Sunday morning), but there’s also a bit of a downside (i.e. meaningless death. Oh, and the rotting. The inevitable, irreversible rotting). Anyway, stayed tuned for the next issue when a hollow, clinically depressed atheist reviews prozac.

7 Comments:
At 2:24 AM,
Anonymous said…
How interesting that you've chosen to tackle religion in your latest post, because so have I. I don't know about you but half the time when I start writing blog stuff I'm not sure what I'm going to write or where it's going to go or how long I'm going to be sat typing it. Things just materialise out of the brain, at least proving there is some kind of activity going on up there whenever I'm in self-doubt! I wrote my longest-ever blog post over the weekend. I think I'm finally crossing the line into genuine autobiographical novel territory! :-)
I enjoyed reading your review. Don't think I'd enjoy reading the subject matter but I definitely liked the review.
At 2:25 AM,
Anonymous said…
Just noticed your 'About Me' has changed. Much funnier but I kind of miss the main strapline of the original version.
At 12:31 PM,
Anonymous said…
This was so good to be honest, I came back to reread it and am again impressed. I appreciate your pin-sharp humour very much.x
At 9:43 PM,
Tonto said…
I enjoyed that. Aa a former seminary student and someone who believes in God...I thought your points were right on and honest.
I think the Da Vinci Code is crap. I have never seen the Left Behind Series but I hear it is great.
Now that I have read your review I think I don't need to bother ever seeing it. I think you pretty much summed it up.
At 1:08 AM,
Snave said…
Matt, you are a much braver person than I. I'm not sure I would want to get started on the "Left Behind" series, because I have heard tell it's good sci-fi... and I like sci-fi. Then again, renowned Scientologist L. Ron Hubbard wrote some "good sci-fi" too! And I only made it about 1/4 of the way through "Battlefield Earth" before I just couldn't take any more!
I would rather spend my time reading self-rewarding things like "Skipping Towards Gomorrah" by Dan Savage or "Trials Of The Monkey: An Accidental Memoir" by Matthew Chapman. These two wonderful books both question religion, particularly fundamentalist Christianity. Or if we're talking sci-fi, maybe the "Neanderthal Parallax Trilogy" by Robert J. Sawyer (has some good discussions about religion), just about anything by Philip K. Dick, or Wingrove's "Chung Kuo" series; all are thought-provoking sci-fi.
I will admit that I did read "The Da Vinci Code" and I liked it. I like an occasional "and then he did this and then he did that" book (that's a category name my good friend J.Marquis of www.arewetheryet.blogspot.com coined in reference to the works of Clive Cussler, another one of my guilty pleasures) mainly because it allows me to take a mental vacation while I suspend either belief or disbelier. Another reason I liked Dan Brown's book is that it got me reading other similar but more detailed works such as "Holy Blood Holy Grail", causing me to continue my thinking about religions as superstitious belief systems based on ancient history, on myths, or on legends. In other words, Brown's premise fits neatly into my comfort zone.
I imagine one could claim the "Left Behind" series stimulates thought... but maybe only if the reader already has a predilection for such a belief system as LaHaye and Jenkins are promoting.
You are a good reviewer, Matt! Thanks. I will be back to your site.
At 2:00 AM,
Samwick said…
"I think I'm finally crossing the line into genuine autobiographical territory!"
Good! That's exciting, you articulate your experiences in such a unique way that it's always
interesting to read. Will this be along the lines of essay writing or through more poetical sorts of expression? I'm going to your blog to see.
Georgina! How long did you attend seminary? What did you think of it? I come from a long line of baptist preachers and, for that reason, received a large scholarship to a Baptist seminary. I actually went for two years, and it was a very positive experience. It was also where I became an atheist, I realized that I had plenty of beliefs and arguments, but zero faith. It's why I am not very critical of religion...it ultimately gets down to an issue of faith, which is something each person has to decide for themselves. And, since atheism itself is premised upon faith, I never feel comfortable questioning the religious decisions people make (well...about god, other decisions, like homophobia, I do have a problem with). I'm sure I fail at this, but I always try to focus any criticisms I have on hypocricy, which, to me, seems to grow out of human nature rather than religion. Anyway, the point being that I've only had good experiences relating to religion, so I hope I'm never coming off as antagonistic towards it. Except for the Mormons, of course. God I hate Mormoms (kidding!).
I seriously do not think you would like the Left Behind series. The characters are so painfully two dimensional that it is difficult to read.
Snave: actually, the braveness I worked up in an attempt to read the Left Behind series collapsed. It's just too awful, I finally gave up about half way through the fourth book. And thanks for listing some of the books you've liked, I will definately look for those. I've actually read a few books in the Chung Kuo series and they were a lot of fun...very detailed and elaborate. I think my favorite sci-fi of all time, that examines religion, is A Canticle for Leibowitz... I can't remember the author's name, but it was interesting.
Okay, I'll admit it too: I read Clive Cussler. I just finished the Atlantis one. And you're right, the Left Behind series does stimulate thoughts....thoughts like "Oh my god, this sucks". I read plent of "mental vacation" books, but these were too bad. They're designed to be an accessible way to witness to the "unsaved", and since they've sold so many copies, I suppose they've worked, atleast on that level. But man they suck. Right now I'm reading the fifth Dune book, which kicks ass.
By the way, you have the funniest site out there. Take care!
At 2:30 AM,
Snave said…
Thanks! If you like being disgusted by puerile junior-high humor, I cordially invite you to check out my latest fish heads article. But don't do it if you have eaten recently!
Post a Comment
<< Home