the last blog

poking intellectual holes in the lid of your simplicity

Wednesday, February 08, 2006

Twilight of the Idle

Jesus, Darwin and Mohammed walk into a bar.

Jesus orders wine. Darwin orders whiskey. Mohammed orders water (he's the designated driver).

A TV above the bar shows images of angry Muslims rioting and burning buildings. Mohammed heaves a heavy sigh and Jesus says, "You okay?"

"Not really," Mohammed replies. "I mean, things have been bad for awhile but to see it all playing out like this on a global stage...it's depressing."

Darwin taps the bar, smiles: "Bartender, another shot please."

Jesus sips his wine, watches the television. He says, "I guess I don't understand. The Koran states that idolatry is forbidden. Creating imagery of you, Mohammed, is a crime punishable by death. But is that what's causing this outcry about the cartoon? Islamic law is broken all of the time without protests and riots. Where is this coming from?"

Mohammed: "I don't think they care about the image. It's the fact that a Western cartoonist drew it. Islam...it's theirs, it what gives their lives meaning, and some outsider is presuming to comment upon it. They feel threatened."

"Yeah. I mean, that's it," Jesus says. "The bible has dozens of laws, yet many Christians focus almost exclusively on homosexuality and abortion. Even if it doesn't impact their own lives, many Christians feel a need to oppose anything that's, I don't know..."

"Different!" Darwin yells out, smiling. "Difference is the key...and this has more to do with biology than religion." He gestures at the television with his drink, which is showing a blurred version of the Islamic caricature. He takes another shot of whiskey and continues. "It's like you were saying Mohammed; in that cartoon, they sense an outsider. They sense a threat to how they define themselves as a group, and that's a dangerous thing. We animals are hardwired to protect that which propagates our most fundamental attribute: our identity!"

Mohammed thinks about it. "Hmm. I guess that makes sense. It's like the whole Mama Bear thing...when another animal gets anywhere near her cubs, she freaks."

"Exactly," Darwin says, " Those cubs contain her DNA...they are the continuance of her genetic legacy, and she will attack anything that comes close to threatening that. She'll even attack when no harm is intended simply because something outside of her gene pool is nearby. If it is otherness, it is a threat."

Jesus: "So in humans that fear of otherness has extended into our social lives. Instead of one's gene pool, they protect group identity. They protect values, laws..."

Mohammed: "Tradition. Culture..."

Darwin: "Ideology. Religion. It doesn't matter: We protect what defines us. We attack what defines them...end of story."

Mohammed sighs again, says, "Hoo. That is depressing. And with the internet, with cell phones...with technology in general becoming cheaper and more portable..."

"Difference is more diffuse," Darwin says, interrupting. "It's everywhere now! Did you know that more genocides occurred in the last century than at any other time in human history? Technology has become a kind of widespread, electric otherness and I fear the global upheavals we are seeing now are only the beginning of a much larger trend."

In silence, they all just sit and stare at their drinks for a bit. Finally, Jesus raises his glass of wine and, in a sad voice, proposes a toast: "Here's to otherness. May it survive this new age of Cartoons and Butchery."

15 Comments:

  • At 2:06 PM, Blogger Jericho said…

    emotion reveals the existence of the otherness, an adversary to some fundamental concept of who we think we are or who we want to be...
    knowledge discovers whether the existence is a gift or a threat and realizes that alternative responses exist...
    wisdom knows the self and the immutable principles that must not be forsaken, then makes the choice accordingly...

    quick thoughts, jotted too quickly, I'm sure... but, as usual, your writing provokes thought - thanks

    ps~ i have been enjoying your blog and have added it to my list - look forward to reading more soon

     
  • At 9:10 PM, Blogger Sheryl said…

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

     
  • At 9:12 PM, Blogger Sheryl said…

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

     
  • At 9:14 PM, Blogger Sheryl said…

    Darn it, sorry about the deletes. Take three.

    My brother subscribed my dad to this publication called New Scientist, and he said they recently had several articles discussing why people invented religion (judging from their website, I believe it was their January 28th edition if you are interested.) Dad was going on about it.

    But I think your theory comes closer to mine. I think it outright has to do with intellectual capacity to deal with chaos. Like they talk about stability versus chaos.

    I think some people cling to what they know because they feel they can rely on it. So it becomes easier to just assume that what we know is superior to everything else.

    Hypothetical example: I know I like pizza, but I can't be sure that if I tried other foods that I would get something I also liked. That time I tried linguini, I hated it.

    Therefore, pizza is superior to all other foods. If anyone questions that, then they are are threatening my limited idea of quality. And if I think pizza is the superior food, then for anyone to suggest otherwise implies that I might not be right. And if I am not right, then I am fallible. But I have to be right because it makes me feel good about myself.

    So I surround myself with pizza lovers, and we all go on about how pizza is the best of all possible foods (so what if we never tried anything else.) It's much simpler this way because experimentation doesn't always work, and we know we like the pizza. Why eat anything else? The pizza lovers are the "we"; the linguini lovers are the "they." "We" are clearly superior to "they" or "them."

    And if a linguini eater ever thought twice about passing judgement about pizza, oh would he be in trouble!

     
  • At 9:21 PM, Blogger Sheryl said…

    PS What I mean is that exploration and experimentation is work, and it is work with a certain risk of failure. So rather than take that risk, it is often easier to just define what we have a superior to all other things, so we don't have to worry that there might be a better way.

    In the same sense that Americans like to say that they live in the greatest country on the planet. It's easier to think that, then to figure out that we don't and implement the changes necessary to make it so.

    Or put another way. It is easier to pretend your shit is gold that to turn your shit into gold.

     
  • At 8:46 AM, Blogger Impulsivecompulsive said…

    Very nice post.
    I've got more to say about it, but I'm running late. So I'll just make this my pre-comment and end it here (for now).

     
  • At 11:52 AM, Blogger Snave said…

    Very nicely done, Matt. I would agree with your three characters that things really haven't turned out for the best re. the way humans use their gifts.

    I really believe people are capable of so much more good than we see in the world today, and that a search for deeper meaning in life is retarded by the artificial constraints we place on ourselves, and by the bypassing of knowledge and wisdom in favor of an emotional approach to things. I would agree this may well be due to a collective human inability to deal with chaos in ways other than what amounts to a human "fight or flight" reflex, that being to react emotionally first and foremost.

    This has become evident in American politics and in world problems.

    Great thought-fodder, Matt!

     
  • At 1:18 PM, Blogger Patrick said…

    Sheryl (and Matt)... it's funny. Just yesterday, my girlfriend wondered aloud why people think Dr. Phil is such a great expert on relationships and weight loss, when he's divorced and fat. I said, probably a bit too emphatically for an offhand remark, that clearly people prefer conviction to actual knowledge. Dr. Phil says things with so much self-assurance behind his words that people think he must know what he's talking about, and that's good enough for them; less work to do.

    Al Franken has remarked that he doesn't believe that there is a liberal tendency in the media so much as a tendency toward laziness. And people who are very sure of things make it easier for other people who don't want to have to figure things out.

    See also: Georges Orwell and Bush.

     
  • At 5:24 PM, Blogger Coping Catherine said…

    Good post. Not much more to say on the subject myself other than we, as humans, need to look at the big picture and evolve.

     
  • At 6:33 PM, Blogger Damien said…

    Ahhh classic post Mattster, I guess alot of us need to step back once a while and start looking at the broader picture. I'mvery casually side stepping the debate at my blog (yeah I know I'm a total chicken). Great post Mattster nice new perspective.

     
  • At 1:06 AM, Blogger Sheryl said…

    Patrick,

    I think that is a good point. People do seem to take people more seriously when they say things empathically. I think that is a lot of Bush's appeal. Adolph Hitler did well from it as well. Which is worse--these leaders with no self doubt or the ones who follow them?

    Reminds me of that line from Star Wars: "Who is the greater fool? The fool or the fool who follows him?"

     
  • At 3:21 AM, Blogger Sheryl said…

    PS You know you are getting philosophical when you start quoting Star Wars, eh? :-)

     
  • At 4:10 AM, Blogger Stan said…

    I'm a little late here, but better late than never. This is a very insightful post. Beautifully written. You're right, these are becoming scary times just for the reason you state. That cartoons in Denmark should provoke loyalist riots in Lebanon shows how small a world it is all of a sudden. And your'e right - loyalty is an instinct. Even us dumb Canadians manage to find all kinds of reasons to think we are superior to Americans. Imagine a country where not only are people loyal to the government just because it is theirs, as most do, but where that government is also their religious leadership. I can't even imagine how much control it would have over them. It brings to mind Nazi Germany, which only used Aryan purity as a religion but with it managed to get it's people to slaughter six million Jews! With gusto!

     
  • At 4:23 AM, Blogger Stan said…

    Just wanted to add that Cheryl's comments on the basis of religion are very insightful. People seem to need to feel that they know what is going on, and if they really KNOW then obviously everybody else DOESN'T.

     
  • At 5:14 AM, Blogger Sheryl said…

    Stan,

    Canada probably is a superior country to the US, especially these days. Except it's probably too cold for people like me.

    How about some progressive locations closer to the equator?

     

Post a Comment

<< Home