And Verily, The Cosmic Knee Hath Spoken
I was watching TBN a few minutes ago, a Christian channel, and some fat guy was screaming about how homosexuality is wrong because god says it's wrong. Let's set aside the fact that a wise and all-knowing deity would be unlikely to engage in one of the more common logical fallacies, the circular argument. "I am the origin of all things; the benevolent creator of the universe and all it's intricate marvels. Why can't men love other men? Um, because...I said so? Is that lame? Look, just shut your pie-hole, mortal!" You have to admit: life really would be a lot easier if moral authority rested entirely with a single, invisible deity. So, this being the case, why not just go ahead and give religious people (the hateful ones) what they want: an end to the separation of church and state? Because if Christians can implement social policies based on their bizarre, arbitrary beliefs, then I think I should be allowed to do the same. I mean, my god, Flarbo, talks to me all the time (usually by barking in morse code, using my neighbors dog as a conduit). He's always giving me a list of rules and recommendations to follow, so I'm finally going to begin insisting that all people respect and obey my beliefs. If Christians want to chisel away at the separation of church and state, then I'm all for it. Here's a brief sampling of the new morality according to our Lord God Flarbo:
-Self-cleaning ovens are evil and must be destroyed. Sure, the oven probably thinks it can just clean itself whenever it wants without a problem...but the cleaning leads to touching; the touching leads to experimentation and, predictably, all masturbatory hell breaks loose. There shall be no Ovens of Naughtiness in Flarboland.
-I'm pretty much with the Christian god on homosexuality. When it comes to marriage, I think love, emotions, and compatibility are totally irrelevant. A lifelong commitment should be based entirely upon what's in your pants. Oh, you have a matching set of genitals? Sorry, but your love is offensive to the Lord and therefore invalid.
-Stop lights, speed limits, and signs that say "No left turn" are banned. Next time you're in your car, just think "Lord of the Flies" and go crazy.
-Do skunks really have to spray that defensive odor stuff every single time they're startled? Seriously, it's 4a.m. and all I want is the newspaper, so just calm down. Anyway, skunks have to die.
-Commercials where obnoxious kids sing maudlin, patriotic songs: nauseating. Don't force me to put your children on the hit list, 'cause I'll do it.
That about covers it for now. You may be asking, "But Flarbo, what are the consequences for disobedience?" Anyone (or thing...and I am looking right at you, self-cleaning oven) who breaks a rule or displeases Flarbo in any way, shall be forced to spend an eternity in Schmell (which is a lot like hell, but with a lake of processed cheese instead of fire. Bring chips).
Thanks.
-Self-cleaning ovens are evil and must be destroyed. Sure, the oven probably thinks it can just clean itself whenever it wants without a problem...but the cleaning leads to touching; the touching leads to experimentation and, predictably, all masturbatory hell breaks loose. There shall be no Ovens of Naughtiness in Flarboland.
-I'm pretty much with the Christian god on homosexuality. When it comes to marriage, I think love, emotions, and compatibility are totally irrelevant. A lifelong commitment should be based entirely upon what's in your pants. Oh, you have a matching set of genitals? Sorry, but your love is offensive to the Lord and therefore invalid.
-Stop lights, speed limits, and signs that say "No left turn" are banned. Next time you're in your car, just think "Lord of the Flies" and go crazy.
-Do skunks really have to spray that defensive odor stuff every single time they're startled? Seriously, it's 4a.m. and all I want is the newspaper, so just calm down. Anyway, skunks have to die.
-Commercials where obnoxious kids sing maudlin, patriotic songs: nauseating. Don't force me to put your children on the hit list, 'cause I'll do it.
That about covers it for now. You may be asking, "But Flarbo, what are the consequences for disobedience?" Anyone (or thing...and I am looking right at you, self-cleaning oven) who breaks a rule or displeases Flarbo in any way, shall be forced to spend an eternity in Schmell (which is a lot like hell, but with a lake of processed cheese instead of fire. Bring chips).
Thanks.

13 Comments:
At 6:59 AM,
Sheryl said…
Lord God Flarbo: "I'm pretty much with the Christian god on homosexuality...."
A Knee Jerk reaction in more ways than one. ;-)
At 1:28 PM,
Christopher said…
Following a Christer for illogic is like following a burning fuse in search of an explosive. And to examine the beliefs of Christers is to have confirmed beyond all reasonable doubt that, as is the case with most non-Christers - there are two reasons for what Christers say and believe: the stated reason and the real reason.
So when a Christer says homosexuality is wicked, his stated reason is that God says it’s wicked; but his real reason is that he has urges to fornicate with men, and doesn’t want to acknowledge this.
And when a Christer says that abortion is wicked, his stated reason is that all life is sacred; but his real reason is that outlawing all abortions would help keep more women perpetually barefoot and pregnant, the better to keep them at home and under his thumb.
At 4:44 PM,
Mindwyrm said…
okay, moderately serious question to what was admittedly a humorous post. You have issues with christians establishing a theocracy. Understood and agreed. I don't think we're as far along that timeline as some but it would be a BAD thing. So what about Islamic theocracy? Is that just as bad? Or okay because it's another culture?
At 5:31 PM,
Samwick said…
I disrespect all religions equally. I respect faith...honest, genuine faith...but any value that de-humanizes another person, that says "I'm better because of my invisible deity" is bullshit. That holds true for Christians, as well as Muslims and Mormons and atheists and agnostics and vegetarians and cats and scissors and pretty much everything. I just focus on knee-jerk Christianity because I'm surrounded by it here in the south. And, with homosexuality, I've never heard one articulate argument against it. It all gets down to, "Because God says so", which is childish. If someone believes this...fine, but they should grow up and support equal rights irregardless. Also, I totally agree with Richard...the more homophobic someone is the more nervous they are about their own sexual orientation. He explained it perfectly and I think it's completely accurate. I'm just jealous that Sheryl thought of "Knee Jerk reaction", that's pretty classic. The only thing I can add, unfortunately, is that Flarbo died for our shins. I know regret having written that.
At 5:49 PM,
Sheryl said…
"The only thing I can add, unfortunately, is that Flarbo died for our shins."
My ex used to say I have an "adorable machine gun laugh" when I am really amused. X-) That was hysterical, Matt!!!! It triggered a machine gun anyway.
At 6:20 PM,
Girl With An Alibi said…
There isn't much that would make me want to leave this country, but an end to separation of Church and state is truly frightening for all the exact reason you've parodied.
I can't for the life of me understand how those who advocate it could have forgotten that this ideal was one of them main things that drove people (still drives) people to come here in the first place. There can be no true religous freedom for any of us if religion becomes the government.
I mean if Flarbo were the government do have any idea how sore my knees would be?!!!
At 1:16 AM,
Snave said…
The hell with religion... there's nothing like a nice, warm self-ceaning oven to get me all hot and bothered! Heh!
At 7:30 PM,
Mark Pettus said…
I'm afraid Girl with an Alibi might need to pack soon. The Supremes are now required to pass the ultimate litmus test regarding their personal beliefs... you must agree that abortion is murder and should be outlawed, and you must have said so outloud. Gays are allowed to serve in the military, as long as they don't say they are gay outloud... actually they can say it, as long as they promise to be celibate, or is it as long as they promise to only have sex with anti-abortionist priests?
I'm so confused. Flarbo help me.
By the way, for anyone sending spam, the secret code is ffjlmp. I repeat, ffjlmp. John has a long mustache.
At 4:39 PM,
Sheryl said…
"you must agree that abortion is murder and should be outlawed"
Just to make sure,this statement was meant to be ironic, right? I certainly do not consider abortion murder.
And for the record, I have never had one and will likely never need one. BUt it is definitely not murder.
Murder is what happens to children in countries with oil when overpopulation makes limited resources valuable enough to murder for.
At 12:46 AM,
Samwick said…
girl with an alibi:"There can be no true religious freedom for any of us if religion becomes the government."
I couldn't have said it better myself. That's the whole point, I'm always disheartened when religious extremists condemn people for no reason and then their bias to be reflected in the law. It's not a good trend.
Snave: "there's nothing like a nice, warm self-cleaning oven to get me all hot and bothered!"
That...that is so disturbing. I mean, my toaster fetish is completely okay, but your oven deal...way out of line.
Mark: "I'm so confused"
I'm with you. It would be different if there were some rational explanation for their biggotry, but it's just "God said so" and that's it, which is bizarre to me.
Sheryl: "this statement was meant to be ironic, right?"
I think Mark is referring to Bush's requirements for a supreme court nominee. He's been quite vocal about Miers' religious beliefs, meaning she passed his religious litmus test...which is depressing.
At 11:58 AM,
Mindwyrm said…
Keep in mind that this particular 'litmus test' that's being applied does go both ways. Most of the Rep's want the nominee to say they're against abortion and most of the Dem's want the nominee to say they're for abortion. It's an unwinnable situation for any nominee.
As for someone's religion being brought up, I don't have a huge issue with it if done correctly. Given the rampant religious fanaticism I think it's a legitimate question whether or not someone would place their religious beliefs above the law. It's obvious that the legislators do this already. We don't want SCOTUS doing it as well. I think Bush pushing Miers because of her religion is wrong but I wouldn't have an issue with the Senate putting the above question to a nominee.
At 1:49 PM,
Mark Pettus said…
A. What Matt said.
B. Being pro-choice is not at all the same as being pro-abortion. Supporting the right to a legal abortion over the butcher's bacchanal that was abortion through the early part of this century is not the same as saying I think abortion is a great thing and I recommend it for everyone. I don't think many people are really in favor of abortion, but a lot of people are in favor of keeping the government out of this very personal decision.
Roe vs. Wade turned on the idea that we have a constitutional right to privacy. What the pro-choice folks are asking is that anyone who sits on the SCOTUS recognize that right.
At 7:55 PM,
Sheryl said…
I'm in favor of abortion when women want it. If people don't really want their children, there is the possibility that they will take out frustrations on their kids. Maybe not physically, but emotionally.
Not to mention the fact that there are too many people on the planet, and we really are murdering people for resources. So I think it is an excellent decision for people who don't want children, which I am in favor of.
Plus I have met people who said that their parents had abortions prior to their being born, and they have pointed out that had their parents kept the unwanted child, then maybe their mother or father would not have been in the position economically or emotionally to have had them later. In some cases it would have meant staying in a an abusive relationship with someone they didn't love. By having the abortion, they were able to wait till they had a mature partner who would be a good parent to his or her kids.
So I don't just see it as keeping the government out of people's business. I see it as a way to ensure that people don't have unwanted children on a planet that is already bursting at the seams.
Post a Comment
<< Home